Found among various papers in the suspect's chambers: evidence of what one unnamed correspondent described as "a classic brainstorm sesh."
Special Exhibit XII
|PREVIOUSLY...| |NEXT...|
Monday, July 07, 2008
New Evidence! New Evidence!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
But wait! What is the sheet music on the other side?
something "the things you are"
hmmmmmm.... the plot thickens
a person watching the defendant sleep could just as easily have written this note.
or is this some kind of frame-up?
we need a handwriting expert.
but even if the handwriting matches the defendant's handwriting, notice that there is no way of dating this document. the defendant may have had a "brain storm sesh" weeks ago.
and even if we were to infer that the defendant did have his "brain storm sesh" the night of the alleged sandwich-eating, the "brain storm sesh" did not necessarily result in the defendant's making and eating of a sandwich. in fact, the document suggests that the defendant liley was more inclined to go to sleep.
i say that the author of this document was more inclined to choose sleep over sandwich because:
1. Sleep is underlined with an excited squiggle, and
2. The document author seems to think that "getting a knife" is a major and time-consuming obstacle.
So whether the defendant or someone else wrote this note, the note indicates a predilection at the time of its writing for sleep but not sandwiching.
For the prosecution ...
1. The handwriting on the document appears to be that of the defendant's.
2. "Just go to sleep" is tagged "get back to this later." In terms of priorities, sandwich eating came first. Sleeping came second.
3. The document was found in the defendant's room, among his personal affects.
4. The document shows design and deliberation, indicating that the defendant's sandwich preparing and eating was premeditated. Moreover, the defendant's claim of intoxication on the night in question wasn't to such a high degree as to prevent legible handwriting and coherent brain storming.
5. Just look at the guy. He's totally guilty.
How the fuck are you gonna defend against a lawyer whose got a FUCKIN SCANNER dudes?!?!?!?! And who is representing himself while simultaneously PROSEFUCKINGCUTING HIS OWN DAMN SELF!?!?!?!?!?!?!
WHAAAAAAT?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
BLAAAAAHHHHHH!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
This whole court is out of order.
Post a Comment